![]() There’s microscopic analysis of individual parts and then there’s macroscopic analysis of how the various parts interact with one another (i.e., aspects) and even patterns that the celestial bodies form on the chart. The celestial bodies may tend to act differently depending on which sect they’re in. How do you reconcile? Well, there are rulerships, there are modalities, there are elemental dignities, and there are distinctions between the diurnal and nocturnal sects of the chart. The House and Sign method of interpretation is essentially a reconciliation of the celestial bodies, signs, and houses. Same with each of the zodiac signs and same with the houses. There are the celestial bodies, each with certain attributes and what those attributes are won’t vary too widely from one astrologer to the next, though each will probably use different words or motifs to express those attributes. I won’t get into that debate about whether astrology is a science, but I will say that natal chart interpretation is a reconciliation process. I know some might try to assert that it’s an empirical science. Reading a natal chart is an intuitive art. ![]() Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech, Source: Wikimedia Commons
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |